PT-2026-67610 · Npm · @Budibase/Server

Publicado

2026-07-24

·

Atualizado

2026-07-24

CVSS v3.1

7.5

Alta

VetorAV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Summary

The Budibase Worker service exposes a public, unauthenticated API endpoint (GET /api/global/users/tenant/:id) that returns sensitive user information including tenantId, userId, email, and ssoId. The endpoint is registered in the PUBLIC ENDPOINTS list with a TODO comment acknowledging it "should be an internal API." Any unauthenticated party can enumerate user emails or IDs to extract sensitive tenant and user metadata, enabling targeted attacks against multi-tenant deployments.

Details

Public endpoint registration at packages/worker/src/api/index.ts lines 56-59:
typescript
// TODO: This should be an internal api
{
 route: "/api/global/users/tenant/:id",
 method: "GET",
},
This endpoint is listed in PUBLIC ENDPOINTS, which is passed to auth.buildAuthMiddleware(PUBLIC ENDPOINTS) at line 154. When a request matches a public endpoint pattern, the authentication middleware sets ctx.publicEndpoint = true and calls next() without performing any authentication (verified at packages/backend-core/src/middleware/authenticated.ts lines 124-126, 249-251).
All subsequent middleware also skips for public endpoints:
  • buildTenancyMiddleware — passes through
  • activeTenant — passes through
  • buildCsrfMiddleware — skipped for GET methods (line 48 of csrf.ts)
  • The budibaseAccess gate at lines 160-168 explicitly returns next() when ctx.publicEndpoint is true
Route registration at packages/worker/src/api/routes/global/users.ts line 139:
typescript
loggedInRoutes
 .get("/api/global/users/tenant/:id", controller.tenantUserLookup)
loggedInRoutes has no auth middleware group — it is created with endpointGroupList.group() (no middleware).
Handler implementation at packages/worker/src/api/controllers/global/users.ts lines 548-562:
typescript
export const tenantUserLookup = async (
 ctx: UserCtx<void, LookupTenantUserResponse>
) => {
 const id = ctx.params.id
 // is email, check its valid
 if (id.includes("@") && !emailValidator.validate(id)) {
  ctx.throw(400, `${id} is not a valid email address to lookup.`)
 }
 const user = await userSdk.core.getFirstPlatformUser(id)
 if (user) {
  ctx.body = user  // Returns full PlatformUser object — no field filtering
 } else {
  ctx.throw(400, "No tenant user found.")
 }
}
The id parameter accepts either an email address (detected by @ presence) or a user ID. The response returns the full PlatformUser object from packages/types/src/documents/platform/users.ts:
typescript
export interface PlatformUserByEmail extends Document {
 tenantId: string  // Tenant identifier
 userId: string   // Internal user ID
}

export interface PlatformUserById extends Document {
 tenantId: string  // Tenant identifier
 email?: string   // User email address
 ssoId?: string   // SSO provider identifier
}

export interface PlatformUserBySsoId extends Document {
 tenantId: string  // Tenant identifier
 userId: string   // Internal user ID
 email: string    // User email address
 ssoId?: string   // SSO provider identifier
}
The lookup function (packages/backend-core/src/users/lookup.ts:48-53) queries the PLATFORM USERS LOWERCASE CouchDB view with include docs: true, returning the complete platform user document including CouchDB id and rev.
Affected files:
  • packages/worker/src/api/index.ts:56-59 — Public endpoint registration
  • packages/worker/src/api/routes/global/users.ts:139 — Route on unauthenticated group
  • packages/worker/src/api/controllers/global/users.ts:548-562 — Handler returning full user object
  • packages/backend-core/src/users/lookup.ts:48-53 — Platform user lookup with include docs: true
  • packages/types/src/documents/platform/users.ts:6-36 — PlatformUser types

PoC

Static verification:
  1. Observe packages/worker/src/api/index.ts:56-59: endpoint in PUBLIC ENDPOINTS with // TODO: This should be an internal api
  2. Trace handler at packages/worker/src/api/controllers/global/users.ts:548-562: no auth checks, returns ctx.body = user (full object)
  3. Trace middleware chain: all middleware passes through for ctx.publicEndpoint === true
  4. Confirm no field filtering, sanitization, or authorization between request and response
Dynamic verification (requires running Budibase instance with at least one user):
bash
# No authentication headers or cookies required
# Lookup by email:
curl -s http://localhost:4002/api/global/users/tenant/admin@example.com

# Response (200 OK):
# {
#  " id": "admin@example.com",
#  " rev": "1-abc123...",
#  "tenantId": "tenant-uuid-here",
#  "userId": "us uuid-here"
# }

# Lookup by user ID:
curl -s http://localhost:4002/api/global/users/tenant/us someuserid123

# Response (200 OK):
# {
#  " id": "us someuserid123",
#  " rev": "1-abc123...",
#  "tenantId": "tenant-uuid-here",
#  "email": "admin@example.com",
#  "ssoId": "google-oauth-id"
# }

# Non-existent user:
curl -s http://localhost:4002/api/global/users/tenant/nonexistent@example.com
# Response: 400 "No tenant user found."
# (Different response confirms user enumeration)
Negative case: Requesting a non-existent user returns HTTP 400 with "No tenant user found.", while an existing user returns HTTP 200 with full data. The different status codes confirm user existence, enabling enumeration.

Impact

This is a CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability.
Who is impacted: All Budibase deployments — both self-hosted and cloud. The impact is highest for multi-tenant (cloud) deployments where tenant IDs are security boundaries and user enumeration across tenants enables targeted attacks.
An unauthenticated attacker can:
  1. Enumerate all user accounts by testing known or guessed email addresses against the endpoint
  2. Extract tenant IDs for any known user, enabling targeted cross-tenant attacks
  3. Extract user IDs (userId) for use in other API calls or attacks
  4. Extract SSO identifiers (ssoId) which may link to external identity providers (Google, OIDC)
  5. Confirm user existence through different HTTP responses (200 vs 400)
  6. Harvest CouchDB revision tokens ( rev) which could assist in CouchDB-level attacks
The returned tenant IDs are particularly dangerous in multi-tenant deployments because they identify the security boundary between organizations. Combined with the hardcoded session keys (separate finding), an attacker could use enumerated tenant IDs to craft targeted session fixation attacks.

Suggested remediation

  1. Remove the endpoint from PUBLIC ENDPOINTS and move it to internal-only routes, as the TODO comment at line 56 already suggests
  2. Add authentication and authorization if the endpoint must remain accessible — require at least builderOrAdmin role
  3. Limit returned fields to only what the consumer actually needs (strip rev, ssoId, and other sensitive fields)
  4. Return generic 404 for both "not found" and "access denied" to prevent user enumeration
  5. Add rate limiting to prevent automated mass enumeration
  6. Regression test: Add a test verifying GET /api/global/users/tenant/:id returns 403 without authentication

Correção

Information Disclosure

Encontrou algum problema na descrição? Tem algo a acrescentar? Fique à vontade para nos escrever 👾
dbugs@ptsecurity.com

Enumeração de Fraquezas

CWE-200

Identificadores relacionados

GHSA-HR66-5MQR-8MPX

Produtos afetados

@Budibase/Server