PT-2026-115982

Published

2026-10-06

·

Updated

2026-10-06

Description by

CVSS 4.0
6.3
Medium
MetricsAV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

VVE-2020-0002

Earlier today, we received a responsible disclosure of a potential issue from @michwill (developer of @curvefi) for Vyper users who use return statements inside for loops of nested internal calls. Returning inside a for loop causes an invalid jump dest, reverting the transaction unnecessarily.
MWE:
python
@internal
def baz():
  for i in range(1):
    return # Stack underflow happens here

@internal
def bar():
  self. baz()

@external
def foo():
  self. bar()

Impact

Impact is minor, it is unlikely a user would encounter this problem unless they were working with nested calls, and return statements inside calls. Even in that scenario, you would encounter a revert which should be noticeable with adequate testing. In limited circumstances, this could cause a DoS attack for public contracts under certain conditions.

Patches

Workarounds

Not returning inside a for loop nested 2+ internal calls deep works as is:
python
@internal
def baz():
  for i in range(1):
    pass
  return # This works fine

@internal
def bar():
  self. baz()

@external
def foo():
  self. bar()

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Exploitability
Fix
Vendors
Affected products
Related identifiers
GHSA-VG88-3V92-RJX2
Found an issue in the description? Have something to add? Feel free to write us 👾