PT-2026-121961
CVE-2026-98984
·
Published
2026-10-23
·
Updated
2026-10-23
Description by
Score
N/A
Not availableNo severity ratings or metrics are available. When they are, we'll update the corresponding info on the page.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dcache: don't put a mountpoint on a dentry that's being removed
rmdir(), unlink() and rename() call dont mount() on the victim and then
detach mounts() with the victim's inode locked. do lock mount() takes
the inode lock of the mountpoint and checks cant mount() so a mount
can't show up after detach mounts().
But attach recursive mnt() makes a second mountpoint for the root of the
source mount so that the mounts already located at the destination can
be put on top of it. No inode is locked for that one and d set mounted()
only refuses a dentry that is unlinked. Between detach mounts() and
d delete() the victim is still hashed:
rmrace: b passed dont mount() and detach mounts(), sleeping
T2: move mount(S, /tmp/plcant/x, BENEATH) = 0 errno 0 ()
T1: rmdir(/tmp/plcant/d/b) = 0 errno 0
109 107 0:61 /d/b//deleted /tmp/plcant/x rw,relatime - tmpfs tmpfs rw
108 109 0:63 / /tmp/plcant/x rw,relatime - tmpfs T rw
A bind mount of the directory that's being removed is moved beneath an
existing mount while the rmdir() is located between the two calls. The
mount ends up on the removed directory and nothing will ever detach it.
Check cant mount() in d set mounted() as well. dont mount() raises the
flag under d lock before detach mounts() runs so either the mountpoint
is set first and detach mounts() finds the mount or the flag is seen and
the mount is refused.
Found an issue in the description? Have something to add? Feel free to write us 👾