PT-2026-59395 · Pypi · Open-Webui
Published
2026-07-13
·
Updated
2026-07-13
CVSS v3.1
5.4
Medium
| Vector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L |
Ollama Model Access Control Bypass via /api/generate, /api/embed, /api/embeddings, and /api/show
Affected Component
Ollama proxy endpoints missing model access control:
backend/open webui/routers/ollama.py(lines 955-995,generate completion)backend/open webui/routers/ollama.py(lines 835-881,embed)backend/open webui/routers/ollama.py(lines 891-937,embeddings)backend/open webui/routers/ollama.py(lines 791-820,show model info)
Affected Versions
Current main branch (commit
6fdd19bf1) and likely all versions with Ollama model access control support.Description
Four Ollama proxy endpoints accept any model name from the user and forward the request to the Ollama backend without checking whether the user is authorized to access that model. These endpoints only require
get verified user (any authenticated non-pending user) and validate that the model exists in the full unfiltered model list, but never check AccessGrants.has access().This is in direct contrast with the
/ollama/api/chat endpoint (line 1101-1122) which correctly validates model access grants and returns 403 for unauthorized users:python
# /api/chat (line 1101-1122) — CORRECTLY checks access
if not bypass filter and user.role == 'user':
user group ids = {group.id for group in Groups.get groups by member id(user.id)}
if not (
user.id == model info.user id
or AccessGrants.has access(
user id=user.id, resource type='model',
resource id=model info.id, permission='read',
user group ids=user group ids,
)
):
raise HTTPException(status code=403, detail='Model not found')
# /api/generate (line 955-995) — NO access check at all
# /api/embed (line 835-881) — NO access check at all
# /api/embeddings (line 891-937) — NO access check at all
# /api/show (line 791-820) — NO access check at allCVSS 3.1 Breakdown
| Metric | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network (N) | Exploited remotely via API calls |
| Attack Complexity | Low (L) | Single API call with a known model name |
| Privileges Required | Low (L) | Requires any authenticated user account |
| User Interaction | None (N) | No victim interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged (U) | Impact within the Ollama model access boundary |
| Confidentiality | Low (L) | /api/show exposes restricted model details including system prompts and parameters |
| Integrity | None (N) | No data modification |
| Availability | Low (L) | Unauthorized consumption of GPU/compute resources on restricted models |
Attack Scenario
- Admin configures model access control, restricting
llama3:70bto the "ML Engineers" group. Regular user Alice is only authorized forllama3:8b. - Alice knows the restricted model name (model names are predictable —
llama3:70b,mistral:latest, etc.). - Alice calls the unprotected endpoints directly:
bash
# Run completions on restricted model
curl -X POST /ollama/api/generate
-H "Authorization: Bearer <alice token>"
-d '{"model": "llama3:70b", "prompt": "..."}'
# View restricted model details and system prompt
curl -X POST /ollama/api/show
-H "Authorization: Bearer <alice token>"
-d '{"model": "llama3:70b"}'
# Generate embeddings with restricted model
curl -X POST /ollama/api/embed
-H "Authorization: Bearer <alice token>"
-d '{"model": "llama3:70b", "input": "..."}'- All requests succeed and are proxied to Ollama without any access control check.
Impact
- Model access control is silently ineffective for four out of five Ollama proxy endpoints
- Unauthorized users can consume GPU/compute resources on restricted models (cost and capacity impact in multi-user deployments)
/api/showexposes restricted model configurations including system prompts, parameters, templates, and license information- Admins have a false sense of security — access restrictions appear to work via the main chat interface but are trivially bypassed via direct API calls
Preconditions
- Ollama must be configured as a backend
- Admin must have configured model access control (not using
BYPASS MODEL ACCESS CONTROL=true) - Attacker must know the restricted model name (model names follow predictable conventions)
Fix
Found an issue in the description? Have something to add? Feel free to write us 👾
Related Identifiers
Affected Products
Open-Webui