PT-2026-90273 · Linux · Linux

CVE-2026-89557

·

Published

2026-09-11

·

Updated

2026-09-11

None

No severity ratings or metrics are available. When they are, we'll update the corresponding info on the page.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md: do overflow check for sb->bblog shift in super 1 load()
In super 1 load(), sb->bblog shift is an u8 type value loaded from on- disk superblock. It is used for badblocks API badblocks set() by the following sequence,
1930 rdev->badblocks.shift = sb->bblog shift; 1931 for (i = 0 ; i < (sectors << (9-3)) ; i++, bbp++) { 1932 u64 bb = le64 to cpu(*bbp); 1933 int count = bb & (0x3ff); 1934 u64 sector = bb >> 10; 1935 sector <<= sb->bblog shift; 1936 count <<= sb->bblog shift; 1937 if (bb + 1 == 0) 1938 break; 1939 if (!badblocks set(&rdev->badblocks, sector, count, 1)) 1940 return -EINVAL; 1941 }
bb->bblog shit is in range of 0-255, variable sector is 64bit width, for an invalid bb->bblog shit, it is possible to make sector be overflowed by the following calculation, 1935 sector <<= sb->bblog shift; Then in turn when call badblocks set() at line 1939 with the invalid rdev->badblocks.shift set at line 1930, may result an overflow inside badblocks clear() in block/badblocks.c.
Although there are many places to call badblocks APIs, the non-zero shift value is only used in super 1 load(), other places always use 0 as the shift value. Therefore it is unnecessary to do a general shift value overflow check inside badblock API, and just check here as the caller.
This may avoid unnecessary check, make the badblocks API code more simple and elegant.
Found an issue in the description? Have something to add? Feel free to write us 👾

Related Identifiers

CVE-2026-89557

Affected Products

Linux